<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Different media require more than a direct translation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://murverse.com/2010/01/12/different-media-require-more-than-a-direct-translation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://murverse.com/2010/01/12/different-media-require-more-than-a-direct-translation/</link>
	<description>The home page for writing, podcasts, and projects of Mur Lafferty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:35:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Allen</title>
		<link>http://murverse.com/2010/01/12/different-media-require-more-than-a-direct-translation/comment-page-1/#comment-3625</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://murverse.com/?p=1093#comment-3625</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re so right that the newspaper industry needs to do a complete re-think of their mission and how to accomplish it.  They need to embrace how the online, interactive media can help them serve their audience.  (I started to say &quot;their readers,&quot; but, that&#039;s almost as out-of-date as the word &quot;paper.&quot;)

It&#039;s especially ironic that Raleigh&#039;s News &amp; Observer, now owned by McClatchy, continues to lay off staff because of competition from online media.  When the Daniels family owned the N&amp;O, Frank Daniels III demonstrated how the newspaper industry could compete using online media.  You can get a sense of how Frank III viewed online technology in a brief item from 1994: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0REL/is_n3_v94/ai_15097571/

I&#039;m just not sure that the news organizations that still call themselves &quot;newspapers,&quot; instead of &quot;news media,&quot; will make the transition that Frank III had in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so right that the newspaper industry needs to do a complete re-think of their mission and how to accomplish it.  They need to embrace how the online, interactive media can help them serve their audience.  (I started to say &#8220;their readers,&#8221; but, that&#8217;s almost as out-of-date as the word &#8220;paper.&#8221;)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s especially ironic that Raleigh&#8217;s News &amp; Observer, now owned by McClatchy, continues to lay off staff because of competition from online media.  When the Daniels family owned the N&amp;O, Frank Daniels III demonstrated how the newspaper industry could compete using online media.  You can get a sense of how Frank III viewed online technology in a brief item from 1994: <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0REL/is_n3_v94/ai_15097571/" rel="nofollow">http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0REL/is_n3_v94/ai_15097571/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m just not sure that the news organizations that still call themselves &#8220;newspapers,&#8221; instead of &#8220;news media,&#8221; will make the transition that Frank III had in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
